- Activists welcome historic visit but demand changes to one-party system
- President Isaias has used conflict with Ethiopia to justify authoritarianism
- Unclear what normalisation with Ethiopia means for Eritrean citizens’ rights
Eritrea’s long-time President Isaias Afewerki is visiting Ethiopia, a country that he has not set foot in since the start of their vicious two-year war in 1998 that led to a long militarized freeze in relations.
The three-day visit ending today came days after a declaration was made to end conflict. The governments have agreed to resume trade, diplomatic relations, and flights between two states that were one country until Eritreans voted for secession in 1993
The President basked in a hero’s welcome at Bole International Airport on Saturday morning where Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed greeted him with a trademark hug. A brass band performed and thousands of people, many waving Eritrean and Ethiopian flags, swept into the streets to mark the historic day.
Former rebel leader and liberation hero Isaias, who has refused to enact Eritrea’s 1997 constitution because of the standoff with Ethiopia, appealed to their ties and shared history. “We are one people that have been estranged for many years. Whoever forgets that doesn’t understand the situation. We can now overcome past enmity and move in a new direction,” he said.
While many citizens are in favour of the rapprochement, some of that overflowing enthusiasm is not shared by exiled Eritreans who criticize their autocratic President for running a one-party authoritarian state.
U.S.-based Eritrean journalist and Executive Director of PEN Eritrea in Exile Abraham T Zere says the events means a lot for the Eritrean people who have been hold hostage for almost 20 years with the sole excuse of the threat from Ethiopia. “Basically we are hoping the country will resume life. Eritreans are only hoping things will dramatically improve with rapprochement,” he said.
The decision to make a renewed push for peace was announced by Ethiopia’s four-party ruling coalition in early June and then rapidly progressed by Prime Minister’s Abiy’s proactive, assertive diplomacy.
Abraham says that all the indications are that things cannot continue the way they have been in Eritrea after this peace deal. “Whatever excuse Isaias tries to find, I doubt he will continue his rule unabashed now. He will be forced to make changes. How he will exit himself safely from the chaos he has created is another issue and only time can tell,” he said.
Isaias has imprisoned rivals and critics, banned the media and enforced indefinite national service. Those measures and accompanying economic woes have led to hundreds of thousands fleeing the country of less than six million people. He used the conflict with Ethiopia to justify his approach, but it is not clear yet what the removal of that justification will mean for conditions inside Eritrea.
Why now?
Amanuel Ghirmay of Radio Erena, a Paris-based satellite radio station said this is a significant occasion, but is not upbeat because there is no sign of a change in Eritrea. “Abiy has taken steps to improve situation in his country but Isaias has done nothing of that sort. He has not shown any readiness to improve the human rights condition and democratic rights. He has not made any promise to end political repression or to stop the never-ending national service. Eritrea remains a one-man leadership with no election and parliamentary system,” he said.
Amanuel, who joined Radio Erena in 2010 after gaining asylum in France, leaving his journalism career in his homeland, says Isaias has not consulted Eritreans on how and why he came to this policy now, two decades after people have paid such a heavy price. “This has not been people-to-people. The Eritrean people have never been at war with Ethiopian people. I myself when I fled to Ethiopia, I was welcomed there. This was a political game between the officials. Meles has been begging him for years. Why now?”
Temesghen Debesai is a freelance journalist based in London, who fled Eritrea in 2006, giving up his state broadcasting television career. He also questions if Eritrea can offer its citizens basic human rights, freedoms and opportunities. “Peace is important. No one questions that. We are all excited about this development. People in both countries are happy to be able to speak to each other via telephone after many years interruption,” he said speaking to the Australian-based broadcaster SBS Tigrinya.
However, Temesghen says his excitement is tempered by his knowledge of the unpredictability of Isaias’ administration. “Does he have the political will to change? Will he allow Eritrean people to travel freely to Ethiopia and do commerce? How will this development benefit the Eritrean people who are suffering from lack of water and electricity disruptions?” he asks.
“How will this development benefit the Eritrean people who are suffering from lack of water and electricity disruptions?”
The nations have technically been at war even after active conflict ended with a 2000 agreement in Algiers and both have hosted rebels groups fighting against the other. An international border commission ruled in 2002 that the disputed town of Badme, a centre of the conflict, was Eritrean. But Addis Ababa refused to implement the ruling without further negotiations, which Asmara refused.
The Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front has been lukewarm about Abiy’s approach, but has gradually and cautiously welcomed developments. Ethiopia is expected to cede the town of Badme to Eritrea, but there may be negotiations over settlements that would be otherwise split by demarcation, and there may some negotiation over the border to accommodate communities that consider themselves Ethiopian or Eritrean.
The Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and Deputy Supreme Commander of the United Arab Emirates Armed Forces Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan reportedly played a key peace-making role in the recent thaw. As part of the Saudi-led coalition, UAE uses a base near the Eritrean port of Assab to launch raids into Yemen in its war against the Houthi movement and recently lent Ethiopia $1 billion in emergency financial support to ease a foreign-exchange crisis.
(Main photo: President Isaias Afwerki is welcomed by Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed upon arriving at the Bole international airport on July 14. Michael Tewelde)
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International licence. Please cite Ethiopia Observer prominently and link clearly to the original article if you republish. If you have any queries, please contact us. Check individual images for licensing details.
To contact Ethiopia Observer write to eoeditors at protonmail.com
(Correction: Attribution has been added to Temesghen Debesai’s comments.)
The goverment of Eritrea has been consistent this entire time. Ethiopia’s refusal to fully implement the Algiers agreement that they had pledged to adhere to is the reason there has been such frosty relations between the two governments for the past two decades. Isaias Afwerki famously said “if Ethiopia were to pull its troops from the disputed areas (Badme being the figurehead) in the morning, we would be ready for negotiations with the Ethiopian government in the afternoon. “
He has not had a sudden change of heart, he has been entirely consistent in his stance and this article omits that context.
As an Ethiopian myself I detest Isaias Afwerki because of how isolated he kept his people from the rest of the world, but his policy has not changed.
That is far from the truth, Isaias has never been consistent. It is a total back flip. The Ethiopian army is still in Badme and no single soldier has been withdrawn from any of the contested areas. All of sudden Why did he decide to make peace now?
On the other hand, Ethiopian position has always been the same. The peace call from previous Ethiopian prime minster Meles and Hailemariam fall on deaf ears even if their position was identical as Dr Abiy. There is still going to be negotiation and discussion on the implementation of the Algiers agreement.
Isaias is far too late ..almost 17 years late.
As a result of his stubborness the country has lost so many of its young citizens and the economy is in tatters.
Isaias has still imprisoned his own long time comrades, like Haile Drue who was his foreign minster and other high officals (famously called G15) for more than 15 years.
Their only crime being they regretted and admitted the border war was a grave mistake. Tyrant Isaias accused them of treachery and threw them to prison.
Isaias may be in a more difficult situation following his acceptance of a peace deal with Ethiopia. The world is watching more intently as the curtains are wide open now. Is he going to allow freedom of religion? Is he going to free Christians and political prisoners (no use arguing there are no political prisoners!)? Is he going to allow Eritrean opposition in Ethiopia and other countries to return to their homeland without fear of imprisonment? Is he going to allow free press? Will he allow a successor (now he is 72) or die in office as all tyrants have done?
I think Eritrean Muslims are the most persecuted majority in Eritrea.
Dear Ahmed Idris,
I will have to agree with you to the degree that your situation goes back to power struggle between Eplf/highlanders v Elf/lowlanders. Isaias played it so well as not to jeopardize relations with Arab benefators.
On the other hand, Muslims were not locked up in metal containers and tortured for their faith as did Christians.